Jay Allen's Blog

Did Obama cheat on his wife with a rich, thieving, drug addict? No. But John McCain did.

There has been a lot of talk about with whom Obama associates? The closest association a person should have is with their spouse. Cindy McCain admitted to stealing pills to support her drug habit. (Read more at Phoenix New Times). And it should have been obvious to a casual observer that Mrs. McCain was high on some sort of tranquilizer when she introduced her husband at the Republican National Convention last month. I am sure many of you would argue about this assertion, but if you applied her "glazed eyes" to anyone living in the projects - you would say that person is "high".

So, here's a quick look at McCain's two closest associates...
 * McCain spouse #1 - McCain cheated on her with a rich, thieving, drug addict
 * McCain spouse #2 - Rich, thieving, drug addict and friend of Charles Keating

And McCain's guilt by association...
 * Both Cindy and John McCain are linked to Charles Keating.
 * John McCain is linked to former Nazi collaborators.
 * John McCain sleeps with a rich, thieving, drug addict.

Any politician has skeletons in their closet. So, why not agree that both Obama and McCain have been linked to bad people and move on to the economy?

Best regards,
Jay

Jay Allen
MovieVoice
jay@movievoice.net

During an interview 10 years ago, John McCain said Osama Bin Laden was not a "bad guy". The interview was conducted by Mother Jones. McCain's exact words were - "You could say, Look, is this guy, Laden, really the bad guy that's depicted? Most of us have never heard of him before... Next thing you know, well, we’ve declared to the terrorists that we’re going to strike them wherever they live. That’s fine. But what’s next?"

In 2008, it seems that McCain's advanced age is to blame for his bad judgment (picking Palin, suspending campaign, etc.). However, with those reckless statements from then 62-year-old McCain about Bin Laden illustrate his natural lack of judgment.

Is McCain's bad judgment age related or is it simply inherent to McCain?

Best regards,
Jay

Jay Allen
MovieVoice
jay@movievoice.net

When asked a question during tonight’s debate, Palin responded in complete sentences, but typically did not provide relevant answers to the questions she was asked (instead reverting to a few overly rehearsed answers).

It is also irritating to hear her condescending “conversational” style. How many times did she say “gonna” or substitute “ing” with “in’”. I believe quite a few former McCain/Palin voters will vote for Obama/Biden simply because they are sick of hearing Palin’s patronizing tone. People should say, voters aren’t stupid Ms. Sarah – you can talk to us like big, educated boys and girls.

Another interesting point I heard tonight – Palin was watched by about 5 million people on her embarrassing, revealing, and disastrous interviews with Katie Couric and Charles Gibson. Palin was watched by about ten (10) times more people for her speech at the Republican National Convention and for tonight’s debate (in which she spoke in complete sentences). So, in other words, 45 million people don't know how uninformed this politician is...

Nobody paying attention to Palin can think she is prepared to be VP. Agree or disagree, what are your thoughts?

Best regards,
Jay

Jay Allen
MovieVoice
jay@movievoice.net

Have you ever heard of Fox News, CNN, Newsweek, or The Washington Post? If you have, then you're not like Governor Sarah Palin.

Last night on the CBS Evening News, Palin was asked where she gets her news. "I've read most of them, again with a great appreciation for the press, for the media," Then when asked for examples she said "Um, all of them, any of them that have been in front of me all these years."

It is very sad for anyone in this country above the age of 15 to not be able to name a source of news. If a person were asked this same question during a job interview and came up with Palin's answer, they wouldn't get the job.

She can kill a moose and produce a cute smile when she lies, but she can't answer a simple question. A vote for Palin is not a vote against the democrats, it is a vote against the future of our country.

What are your thoughts?

Best regards,
Jay

Jay Allen
MovieVoice
jay@movievoice.net